This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property,
Government

Jun. 4, 2020

Platform immunity without the Communications Decency Act

Politicians from both political parties have floated various proposals for limiting or eliminating CDA immunity. If those efforts succeed, online platforms will find themselves without a key protection against user-content-based litigation.

John Major

Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP

Email: John.Major@mto.com

John frequently represents technology companies in platform liability matters.

For more than 20 years, the Communications Decency Act has provided an important defense for online platforms -- like Facebook, Twitter and Amazon -- to liability based on third-party users' content. The classic case for CDA immunity is when a plaintiff attempts to hold an internet platform liable for defamatory user posts. The CDA provides the platform with immunity and tells the plaintiff to sue the party that's directly responsible for the harm -- the user who made...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up