This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Government,
Civil Litigation,
California Courts of Appeal

Jun. 8, 2020

Cities take note: Development agreements are to protect developers

A recent opinion should serve as a warning to cities and counties that development agreements are meant to provide protection to developers. Giving in to public outrage may look good to a politician but the result can be quite costly for a city.

Kenneth B. Bley

Partner
Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP

Email: kbley@coxcastle.com

As a practical matter, the vested rights doctrine protects developers from changes in the law. In 1976 the California Supreme Court adopted a late vesting rule in AVCO Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional Commission, holding that a developer's rights vested only when the developer had substantially relied in good faith on a validly issued permit. An earlier court of appeal case, cited with approval in AV...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up