This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Criminal

Jun. 18, 2020

Controlling qualified immunity: Amend the Civil Rights Act

Many argue that the defense of qualified immunity protects the police more than the Civil Rights Act protects its citizens.

John H. Minan

Emeritus Professor of Law
University of San Diego School of Law

Professor Minan is a former attorney with the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and the former chairman of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board.

The killing of George Floyd by Minnesota police has sparked protests for racial justice throughout the country. The use of excessive or lethal force by the police also has prompted the discussion of whether the defense of qualified immunity has a continued place in American jurisprudence.

The Civil Rights Act of 1871 imposes civil liability upon "every person" who while acting under color of state law violates a plaintiff's constitut...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up