U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law
Jul. 28, 2020
Kelo, continued
For those who have either forgotten or don’t keep up with takings law, Kelo v. New London was the bombshell case in which a 5-4 majority approved the condemnation of an inoffensive working class Connecticut neighborhood in order to provide amenities for the nearby Pfizer development.
Michael M. Berger
Senior Counsel
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP
2049 Century Park East
Los Angeles , CA 90067
Phone: (310) 312-4185
Fax: (310) 996-6968
Email: mmberger@manatt.com
USC Law School
Michael M. Berger is senior counsel at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, where he is co-chair of the Appellate Practice Group. He has argued four takings cases in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Fifteen years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court created an uproar in the takings world (not to mention in the citizenry at large) when it decided Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005). For those who have either forgotten or don't keep up with takings law, that was the bombshell case in which a 5-4 majority approved the condemnation of an i...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In