This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government,
Civil Litigation

Jul. 30, 2020

Trump’s efforts to suppress speech are deeper than you thought

In important ways, the John Bolton and Mary Trump cases are not representative of the broader ongoing efforts of Trump and his acolytes to use nondisclosure agreements to stifle criticism of the president.

Joe Slaughter

Associate
Ballard Spahr, LLP

Joe practices Media, Entertainment, and First Amendment law.

In two recent, high-profile court cases that generated headlines across the country, President Donald Trump, his administration, and his family invoked nondisclosure agreements in an effort to stop publication of highly anticipated, and highly critical, books -- one by John Bolton, his former national security advisor, and one by Mary Trump, his niece.

But in important ways, the Bolton and Mary Trump cases are not representative of t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up