This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Aug. 24, 2020

Interpreting the law or ignoring it? Prosecutorial overreach in the face of tragedy

Chelsea Becker was charged with murder after giving birth to a stillborn child. But is that ever, under any circumstances, a chargeable crime? The state attorney general says no.

Theshia Naidoo

Managing Director of Criminal Justice Law and Policy
Drug Policy Alliance

Email: tnaidoo@drugpolicy.org

As lawyers and as advocates, we are continually mindful of the line between interpreting the law in a way that is most favorable to our client or cause and outright ignoring or misapplying a law. This is the difference between zealous advocacy and crossing the bounds of the law. The prosecution of Chelsea Becker is a tragic illustration of crossing this line. Superior Court of Kings County v. Becker, F081341.

$95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up