Civil Litigation,
Alternative Dispute Resolution,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Aug. 28, 2020
How scared should we be? Vacatur of arbitration awards in the wake of Monster Energy
The 9th Circuit’s decision in Monster Energy Co. v. City Beverages LLC will have significant implications for the enforceability of arbitration awards in federal courts, as well as for the arbitrator selection process.
Blaine I. Green
Partner
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Email: blaine.green@pillsburylaw.com
Blaine leads the firm's Native American Law practice, representing tribes and companies doing business with tribes.
Dustin Chase-Woods
Associate
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Monster Energy Co. v. City Beverages LLC -- and the U.S. Supreme Court's June 29 denial of Monster's petition for certiorari -- will have significant implications for the enforceability of arbitration awards in federal courts, as well as for the arbitrator selection process.
$95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In