This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Immigration,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Sep. 11, 2020

Ruling is a sharp departure from the border search exception

A surprise decision came from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week in which the court denied a petition by the government-appellee for an en banc rehearing.

Jared C. Leung

Managing Attorney
JCL Immigration Attorneys, PLLC

A surprise decision came from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week in which the court denied a petition by the government-appellee for an en banc rehearing. See United States v. Cano, 2020 DJDAR 9667 (Sept. 2, 2020). The court had been asked to review a panel decision that completely altered the interpretation of the border search exception to the 4th Amendment proh...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up