Law Practice,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Oct. 16, 2020
Deciphering conflicts based on personal relationships with opposing counsel
A recent ethics opinion by the American Bar Association examines intimate relationships, friendships and acquaintances with opposing counsel in deciding when a “material limitation” conflict arises that requires client consent.




Mark L. Tuft
Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson US LLP
Legal malpractice (certified), media law, civil and criminal litigation in federal and state courts
1333 North California Boulevard Suite 450
Walnut Creek , CA 94596
Phone: (415) 765-6215
Email: mark.tuft@wbd-us.com
UC Hastings

Practicing law for any length of time in communities, large or small, will ordinarily result in personal relationships with opposing counsel. A recent ethics opinion by the American Bar Association examines intimate relationships...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In