This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Oct. 16, 2020

Deciphering conflicts based on personal relationships with opposing counsel

A recent ethics opinion by the American Bar Association examines intimate relationships, friendships and acquaintances with opposing counsel in deciding when a “material limitation” conflict arises that requires client consent.

Mark L. Tuft

Partner
Womble Bond Dickinson US LLP

Legal malpractice (certified), media law, civil and criminal litigation in federal and state courts

1333 North California Boulevard Suite 450
Walnut Creek , CA 94596

Phone: (415) 765-6215

Email: mark.tuft@wbd-us.com

UC Hastings

Shutterstock

Practicing law for any length of time in communities, large or small, will ordinarily result in personal relationships with opposing counsel. A recent ethics opinion by the American Bar Association examines intimate relationships...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up