Intellectual Property
Nov. 24, 2020
Northern District amends Local Rules on claim construction disclosures
On Nov. 4, the Northern District of California amended its Patent Local Rules to clarify when, and to what extent, disclosures are due for claim construction experts.
Matthew A. Chivvis
Partner
Morrison & Foerster LLP
425 Market St 32nd Fl
San Francisco , CA 94105
Phone: (415) 268-7307
Email: mchivvis@mofo.com
University of San Francisco SOL; San Francisco CA
On Nov. 4, the Northern District of California amended its Patent Local Rules to clarify when, and to what extent, disclosures are due for claim construction experts. Why does this matter? In Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015), the Supreme Court held that claim construction fact determinations based on extrinsic...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Intellectual Property
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
Reviewing court may not set aside district court’s determination on subsidiary factual matter involving patent claim without finding of clear error.
