This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance,
Environmental & Energy

Dec. 30, 2020

Defining environmental contamination insurance costs

Policyholders seek to maximize the benefits of insurance by characterizing costs as defense costs, while insurance companies seek to minimize defense costs by categorizing them as indemnity costs.

Jordan Stanzler

Stanzler Law Group

Jstanzler@Stanzlerlawgroup.com

Jordan represents policyholders in complex matters and is a co-author of "Insurance Coverage Litigation," a treatise on the subject.

A recurring issue in cases involving insurance coverage for environmental contamination is whether the costs required by a government agency should be treated as defense costs or indemnity costs. Under the typical liability policy, the limits of insurance apply to indemnity, but not to defense costs, which are unlimited. Policyholders seek to maximize the benefits of insurance by characterizing costs as defense costs, while insurance companies seek to minimize defense...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up