This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Family

Jan. 19, 2021

Determining permanent spousal support: in theory vs in practice

In the immortal words of Yogi Berra: “In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.”

Franklin R. Garfield

Garfield & Tepper

Email: frank@frankgarfield.com

In the immortal words of Yogi Berra: "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." The truth of this timeless maxim is illustrated by the disconnect between the theory for determining the amount of permanent spousal support mandated by Family Code Section 4320 and the practice on the ground.

The disconnect arises because temporary spousal support is routinely determined by using the Dissomast...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up