This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Labor/Employment,
Civil Litigation,
California Courts of Appeal

Feb. 9, 2021

4th District considers whether California’s gig worker law applies to Instacart

The city of San Diego alleges Instacart misclassified drivers as independent contractors in 2019, days before Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 5, the statute that tightened the definition of “independent contractor.

Despite Instacart's support for Proposition 22, which upheld the status of California's app-based drivers as independent contractors, the question of whether the ballot measure even applies to Instacart's drivers seemed far from settled Monday as attorneys debated the issue before a court of appeal.

In a brief filed ahead of Monday's hearing, San Diego Deputy City Attorney Kevin B. King said under the terms of Proposition 22, compa...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up