U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Apr. 1, 2021
The [limited] right to keep and [absolutely no] right to bear arms
On March 24, the 9th Circuit sitting en banc affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a Second Amendment lawsuit challenging Hawaii’s licensing law, which requires that residents seeking a license to openly carry a firearm in public must demonstrate “the urgency or the need” to carry a firearm and that the applicant be actively “engaged in the protection of life and property” when openly carrying a firearm.
On March 24, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sitting en banc affirmed the district court's dismissal of a Second Amendment lawsuit challenging Hawaii's licensing law, which requires that residents seeking a license to openly carry a firearm in public must demonstrate "the urgency or the need" to carry a firearm and that the applicant be actively "engaged in the protection of life and property" when openly carrying a firearm. $95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In