This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Health Care & Hospital Law,
Civil Litigation

May 4, 2021

Objections predominate in opioid trial of 4 pharmaceutical companies

Attorneys for the other drug companies facing deceptive marketing allegations in California have repeatedly stressed the need for plaintiffs’ attorneys to clearly identify each individual drug company in allegations and questions asked of witnesses.

The goal of a 20-year-old pharmaceutical marketing campaign was to increase prescriptions and drive sales of opioids, a marketing executive testified in a deposition tape played Monday in California's $50 billion bench trial of four drugmakers accused of deceptive marketing.

In the third week of the state's case, Rhode Island attorney Fidelma L. Fitzpatrick of Motely Rice LLC played the 2019 testimony of Nathalie Leitch, a senior m...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up