This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Courts of Appeal,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Jun. 8, 2021

Ex parte communication leads to arbitrator’s disqualification

With rare exceptions, such as a need to discuss administrative matters, an ex parte communication between an arbitrator and attorney is unethical.

Marc D. Alexander

Attorney and Mediator
Alternative Resolution Centers (ARC)

Email: alexanderdisputeresolution@gmail.com

See more...

With rare exceptions, such as a need to discuss administrative matters, an ex parte communication between an arbitrator and attorney is unethical. Even when discussing administrative matters ex parte, the arbitrator must disclose the communication to the other side, and give an opportunity to respond, before a final decision is made. The obvious danger is that an ex parte communication may provide evidence or other information that will improperly influence the arbitr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up