Civil Litigation,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Jul. 12, 2021
Court narrowly interprets arbitrator disclosure decision, urges rehearing en banc
The 9th Circuit maelstrom over arbitrator disclosure requirements intensified June 24 when a three-judge panel reversed and remanded a judgment confirming an arbitration award — a result “required by” a different panel’s decision 20 months ago in Monster Energy — while all three judges encouraged their colleagues to reconsider Monster Energy en banc.
Blaine I. Green
Partner
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Email: blaine.green@pillsburylaw.com
Blaine leads the firm's Native American Law practice, representing tribes and companies doing business with tribes.
The 9th Circuit maelstrom over arbitrator disclosure requirements intensified June 24 when a three-judge panel reversed and remanded a judgment confirming an arbitration award -- a result "required by" a different panel's decision 20 months ago in Monster Energy -- while all three judges encouraged their colleagues to reconsider Monster Energy en banc.
$95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In