This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility,
California Courts of Appeal

Jul. 26, 2021

Retired judge shouldn’t have decided Jolie v. Pitt case, panel says

“ … Just because it is no longer criminal for a temporary judge to receive compensation from private parties doesn’t mean it’s a good idea,” wrote 2nd District Court of Appeal Justice John L. Segal.

Retired judge shouldn’t have decided Jolie v. Pitt case, panel says
Presiding Justice Dennis M. Perluss of the 2nd District Court of Appeal, Division 7

Retired judge shouldn't have decided Jolie v. Pitt case, appeals panel says

An appellate panel has given a retired judge a bad review in a dispute involving two movie stars. One justice also panned the system that allowed John W. Ouderkirk to accept compensation from the parties in the case, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt.

Overruling the Los Angeles County Superior Court, the 2nd Distric...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up