Civil Litigation,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Jul. 29, 2021
9th Circuit wonders if dormant commerce clause is insignificant
The federal appellate panel on Wednesday rejected a challenge by pork producers to a voter-approved proposition that requires pigs and other animals be given more space than national industry standards.
A federal appellate panel on Wednesday rejected a challenge by pork producers to a voter-approved proposition that requires pigs and other animals be given more space than the national standards.
The ruling is the second time this year the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a challenge to a California law that claimed it violated the dormant commerce clause.
In February, a different panel re...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
Proposition 12 does not impose impermissible extraterritorial effects where it is neither price-control nor price-affirmation statute.
