Civil Litigation
Oct. 28, 2021
Class of alleged revenge porn victims won’t pursue Reddit lawsuit
U.S. Judge James V. Selna of the Central District of California dismissed the complaint, saying he believed Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which shields online platforms from liability for posts made by third parties, likely doomed the lawsuit.
Lawyers representing a class of alleged victims of revenge porn and their parents told a federal judge Wednesday that they would not pursue a lawsuit against Reddit Inc.
Earlier this month, U.S. Judge James V. Selna of the Central District of California dismissed the complaint, saying he believed Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which shields online pl...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Government, Constitutional Law, Administrative/Regulatory
State lawmakers mull costs, benefits of social media control
By Skyler Romero
Civil Rights, Civil Litigation
Reddit not liable for pornographic posts of underage girls
By Gina Kim
Civil Litigation
Reddit denies claims in suit that it allows child pornography
By Gina Kim
