Judges and Judiciary
Jan. 28, 2022
Challenge to assigned judges program is dismissed, again
Attorney for the plaintiffs – a group of eight retired judges – said he plans to file a third amended complaint.
A San Francisco judge has again dismissed a case brought by a group of retired judges who challenged limits on the Judicial Council's Temporary Assigned Judges Program.
In a ruling on Wednesday, Judge Ethan P. Schulman dismissed the plaintiffs' constitutional claims and refused to consider discovery requests. He allowed them 20 days to amend for their cause of action under t...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Judges and Judiciary, Civil Litigation
Retired judges give statistics in new try against assignment limits
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Judges
Mahler v. Judicial Council of California
Although plaintiffs' complaint was not barred by legislative immunity, their disparate impact age discrimination claim failed to allege causal connection.
