U.S. Supreme Court,
Letters,
Land Use
Mar. 10, 2022
Justice’s dissent outlines way forward in dispute over increasing Berkeley enrollment
I have read a number of the Daily Journal’s recent articles regarding the dispute between Save Berkeley’s Neighborhood and the University of California at Berkeley. The articles present what each party’s arguments are, but appear to be giving them equal weight.
I have read a number of the Daily Journal's recent articles regarding the dispute between Save Berkeley's Neighborhood and the University of California. (E.g., most recently, "Supreme Court refuses to lift limits on UC Berkeley's enrollment," March 4.) The articles present what each party's arguments are, but appear to be giving them equal weight.
As a resident of Berkeley, I do not...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Land Use, Education Law
Lawmakers work around court's Berkeley student cap
By Diana Bosetti
Legal Education, Land Use, California Supreme Court
Supreme Court refuses to lift limits on UC Berkeley’s enrollment
By Craig Anderson
