This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration

Dec. 1, 2022

The primary rights theory of claim preclusion

The prudent pleader will initiate litigation by first identifying the harm (primary right) for which recovery is sought, and then asserting all possible legal theories, naming all possible responsible parties, and seeking all possible remedies.

David M. Axelrad

Partner
Horvitz & Levy LLP

Email: daxelrad@horvitzlevy.com

UC Hastings COL; San Francisco CA

Once a cause of action has been adjudicated, it's over and done, and cannot be relitigated. We used to call this the claim preclusion aspect of res judicata. Now we just call it claim preclusion. (Samara v. Matar (2018) 5 Cal.5th 322, 326 & fn. 1.) The principle serves the policy of repose and finality and sounds simple enough, but as is often true in the law, it's not. Let's discuss.

The basic contours of claim preclusion are we...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up