Litigation & Arbitration
Aug. 15, 2023
Judge revives Uber worker claim arbitrator said was time-barred
The plaintiff’s attorneys contend that her termination for “poor performance” in March 2019 created a new statutory time clock that should begin after she received a right to sue notice in February 2022 from the state Department of Fair Employment and Housing.
A San Francisco judge revived an arbitration proceeding on Monday between Uber Technologies Inc. and a former software engineer who accused the company of gender discrimination and creating a hostile work environment.
Superior Court Judge Richard B. Ulmer granted in part the request of the petitioner, Yingnan Li, to vacate a summary judgment motion by an independent arbitrator who found that her claims against the company for violations of...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In