This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government,
Constitutional Law

Aug. 18, 2023

A vague rule to define the ‘receiver’ of a firearm is confusing and divisive

In 2022, the ATF issued its Final Rule, “Definition of Frame or Receiver.” As a microcosm of our Nation’s divisions, the reaction was swift, hostile, and bitterly divided: 290,000 comments were received, a Justice Department record. Like a proverbial Rorschach blot, the Final Rule was viewed in vastly different ways.

Matthew Sean Harrison

Attorney
Prometheus Civic Law, P.C.

In 1968, shortly after the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy, the U.S. Congress passed the Gun Control Act (GCA). (Pub. L. No. 90-618.) The GCA defines "firearm," in relevant part, as: "any weapon...which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive" or "the frame or receiver of any such weapon." (18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3).) The GCA also requires importers or manufacturers of firearms...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up