
California Supreme Court Justice Carol A. Corrigan wrote opinion that corrects a "mundane error" in the lower courts.
The California Supreme Court clarified Thursday what the proper standard of review should be for the Courts of Appeal when a defendant challenges a decision to instruct a jury to apply a concurrent intent or “kill zone” theory to an attempted murder allegation.
Robert Weisberg, Stanford University law professor and faculty co-director of the Stanford Criminal Justice Center, explained in an interview Thursday that the opinion corrects a “m...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In