Sep. 6, 2023
Tesla denies monopoly over maintenance, new parts
Stuart G. Gross of Gross Klein PC argued that Tesla failed to meet its burden of establishing the consumers clearly and unmistakably agreed to arbitrate their parts and repair services claims.
Tesla Inc. asked a federal judge to send to arbitration or dismiss claims that it is engaging in anticompetitive conduct to create and maintain a monopoly in the aftermarket for its electric vehicle replacement parts and maintenance services.
The company’s attorneys argued that what plaintiffs claimed it was doing does not make sense. They asked why Tesla would deliberately worsen the customer experience for a service that makes up a tiny...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In