In a new twist in the legal battle over enforcement of San Francisco’s anti-camping laws, the city attorney’s office said the case should be heard by a different judge than the one who issued a preliminary injunction against it because of an alleged conflict with a settlement agreement with UC College of Law, San Francisco.
The city attorney’s office and lawyers for the Coalition on Homelessness each accused the other side of judge-shopping...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In