This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Labor/Employment

Apr. 25, 2024

More complications for some employers with arbitration agreements

The Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC ruling complicates the class and collective action landscape for California employers, who already face challenges in enforcing arbitration agreements against PAGA actions and other claims.

Michelle Roberts Gonzales

Partner, Hogan Lovells

Shutterstock

The ground keeps shifting for California employers seeking to enforce arbitration agreements, with each new ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court and California Supreme Court redefining who is subject to arbitration agreements and class action waivers.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s latest ruling on the Federal Arbitration Act focuses on “transportation workers” and could lead to a new crop of employees seeking to avoid arbitration agreements by cla...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)