Evidence,
Civil Litigation
Apr. 29, 2024
Experts, case-specific facts, and hearsay
In re Marriage of Lietz, a recent civil case, highlights the importance of understanding the application of People v. Sanchez, which can result in the exclusion of expert testimony.
Gary A. Watt
Partner
Hanson Bridgett LLP
State Bar Approved, Certified Appellate Specialist
Email: gwatt@hansonbridgett.com
Gary chairs Hanson Bridgett's Appellate Practice. He is a State Bar-approved, certified appellate specialist. In addition to writs and appeals, his practice includes anti-SLAPP and post-trial motions as well as trial and appellate consulting. His blog posts can be read at www.appellateinsight.com.
Last February the Court of Appeal published a decision, In re Marriage of Lietz, that at first glance might not inspire great excitement. The case concerned the size of a lot and its impact on valuation. However, within the folds of this seemingly mundane civil matter lies a valuable reminder for litigators: application of People v. Sanchez, 63 Cal. 4th 665 (2016) can result in exclusion of expert testimony. Wha...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In