U.S. Supreme Court
Jul. 5, 2024
SCOTUS issues decisions on social media content moderation
In a 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court took a pass on one internet moderation case, but suggested that the other two are unconstitutional.
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/linkedin.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/twitter.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/threads.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/facebook.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/people/avatars/000/149/010/original/Levy__Allonn.jpg?1720050891)
Allonn E. Levy
Shareholder, Hopkins & Carley
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/people/avatars/000/228/745/original/Meesha_Reiisieh_32_.jpeg?1720050913)
Meesha Reiisieh
Clerk, Hopkins & Carley
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/articles/images/000/379/589/original/shutterstock_1895129845.jpg?1720050764)
In the first of two highly anticipated Supreme Court decisions involving the ability of social media companies to moderate content posted on their platforms, the Supreme Court last week decided not to decide.
The High Court last Wednesday issued its opinion in Murthy v. Missouri, holding that the parties did not establish standing—a preliminary requirement all litigants must show in order to have their dispute r...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In