U.S. Supreme Court,
Government,
Criminal
Jul. 12, 2024
Supreme Court decision weakens federal corruption enforcement on local officials
The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Snyder v. United States has introduced a potential loophole in federal corruption enforcement concerning local and state officials. This highlights the Court's tendency to create a favorable environment and strong protections for white-collar defendants, particularly in distinguishing between misconduct that is morally wrong versus criminally actionable.
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/linkedin.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/twitter.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/threads.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/facebook.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/people/avatars/000/228/799/original/Chemerinsky_Jeffrey_for_Dai.jpg?1720738478)
Jeff Chemerinsky
Partner, Kendall Brill & Kelly
White-collar defense, Complex commercial litigation
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/articles/images/000/379/708/original/shutterstock_2487411063.jpg?1720738229)
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Snyder v. United States is the latest in a series of decisions protecting white-collar defendants and narrowing federal statutes used in such prosecutions. In 2020, in Kelly v. United States, the so-called “Bridgegate” case involving the closing down of highway lanes to punish a political rival in New Jersey, Justice Elana Kagan wrote, in finding the defendant’s conduc...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In