For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration

Aug. 8, 2024

Is arbitration under attack? Arbitration, Schmarbitration


The short answer is no: Arbitration is more prominent than ever.

Christopher David Ruiz Cameron

Justice Marshall F. McComb Professor of Law , Southwestern Law School

Shutterstock

A few weeks ago, at a meeting of dispute resolution professionals in San Diego, I joined a panel called "Arbitration Under Attack: Reform or Revolution?" The panel began with my distinguished colleagues discussing the ins and outs of recent legislation outlawing the enforcement of mandatory, predispute arbitration agreements for certain #MeToo claims (Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, P.L. 117-90, 136 Stat. 26 (Mar. 3, 2021)). 


But the re...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails

Related Content

Employment Law

Circuit City Stores Inc. v. Adams

Workers with employment contracts may be compelled to arbitrate employment disputes under federal law.

Employment Law

EEOC v. Waffle House Inc.

EEOC may seek victim-specific relief despite employee's binding arbitration agreement with employer.

Arbitration

Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis

Federal Arbitration Act trumps savings clause and National Labor Relations Act, requiring enforcement of arbitration agreements, including terms requiring individualized proceedings.

Arbitration

Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana

Where California law under *Iskanian* does not allow PAGA actions to be divided into individual and nonindividual claims through an agreement to arbitrate, it is preempted by the Federal ...

Contracts

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

State law prohibiting arbitration of particular claim outright is preempted by Federal Arbitration Act.

Arbitration,

Smith v. Spizzirri

When a lawsuit involves an arbitrable dispute and a party requests a stay pending arbitration, the Federal Arbitration Act compels courts to issue a stay rather than dismissing the action.



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.