Intellectual Property,
Class Action,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Oct. 16, 2024
Consumers try new 'weak patents' gambit against Qualcomm in antitrust case
Adam J. Zapala, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP in Burlingame, made a new argument before a skeptical circuit panel, saying that Qualcomm "took weak patents and tied them to their chips," requiring plaintiffs to give up their right to challenge the patents' validity.





Hoping to overcome recent setbacks at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to a consumer antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm Inc., a plaintiffs' lawyer sought Tuesday to reverse a company victory or persuade an appellate panel to seek direction from the state Supreme Court.
Adam J. Zapala, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP in Burlingame, tried out a new argument before a skeptical circuit panel, saying that Qualcomm "took weak patents and tied them to thei...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In