This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property,
Class Action,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.

Oct. 16, 2024

Consumers try new 'weak patents' gambit against Qualcomm in antitrust case

Adam J. Zapala, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP in Burlingame, made a new argument before a skeptical circuit panel, saying that Qualcomm "took weak patents and tied them to their chips," requiring plaintiffs to give up their right to challenge the patents' validity.

Zapala. Photo: Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP

Hoping to overcome recent setbacks at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to a consumer antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm Inc., a plaintiffs' lawyer sought Tuesday to reverse a company victory or persuade an appellate panel to seek direction from the state Supreme Court.

Adam J. Zapala, a partner with Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP in Burlingame, tried out a new argument before a skeptical circuit panel, saying that Qualcomm "took weak patents and tied them to thei...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails