This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Nov. 20, 2024

Judges: New ethics opinion discourages them from election-time defense

All the publicly posted comments from judges said the opinion's cautions - particularly suggestions that judges have others defend them in such situations - will discourage judges from taking advantage of the amendment to Canon 3B (9).

An ethics panel's final opinion aimed at encouraging California judges to take advantage of a 2020 Canon change allowing them to defend pending cases that are criticized during a recall or re-election campaign is likely to have the opposite effect, according to comments by the California Judges Association and several individual judges.

The Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions solicited comments starting Aug. 5 on its Formal Opinion 2024-027. All the publicly po...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails