This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Class Action

Dec. 9, 2024

Judge concerned about 25% in fees for 23andMe settlement

The judge said he had serious concerns about the $7.5 million in fees for the $30 million settlement, noting "there was no real substantive litigation in the case" and the agreement was signed three months after lead counsel were appointed.

A motion for preliminary approval of the $30 million settlement of a multi-district class action by millions of customers of the 23andMe genetic testing company over a data breach has been conditionally granted by a federal judge in San Francisco.

Attorney fees are to total no more than $7.5 million, though U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen wrote in his Dec. 4 order that he had serious concerns about the amount - which is the 25% benchmark - because "there was no real substa...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails