A judge tentatively granted a motion to strike and demurrer for large parts of a $4 million alcohol tax case in which drinks giant Diageo seeks to overturn a rare rule, which it claims is unconstitutional, that allows liquor taxed by the state of California as well as in the city and county of San Francisco.
However, he kept alive the company's claim that the tax policy is preempted by the state Constitution.
Diageo, a UK based entity, seeks a refund from the city for...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In