This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Jan. 29, 2025

It is finally time to get rid of Penn Central

Two COVID-era cases from Michigan challenge the Supreme Court's murky standards for when government regulations amount to property takings.

Shutterstock

It is time for the United States Supreme Court to face reality: No one likes its decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978). Penn Central is the case the Supreme Court has called its "polestar" in regulatory takings cases; in other words, it is the guiding light that is supposed to show the way to the answer when regulations are challenged as takings under the Fifth Amendment.

If you are late to the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails