I am, personally, fine with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal's upholding of California's ban on large-capacity firearm magazines in Duncan, et. al. v. Bonta. I don't buy Judge VanDyke's dissenting argument (and video) to the apparent effect that, just because a manufacturer makes (or could possibly make) a high-capacity magazine and sell it with the gun, that makes it protected and untouchable under the 2nd Amendment. That would render public safety subject to whate...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In