California Supreme Court
Apr. 17, 2025
'Unfairness' in consumer protection cases: the latest from the California Supreme Court
In Capito v. San Jose Healthcare, the California Supreme Court addressed the scope of "unfair" business practices under section 17200, ruling that hospitals don't need to disclose emergency service fees beyond what is required by existing regulations, while suggesting that "unfairness" in consumer cases may be limited by the Cel-Tech "safe harbor" rule.





David M. Axelrad
Partner
Horvitz & Levy LLP
Email: daxelrad@horvitzlevy.com
UC Hastings COL; San Francisco CA

In Capito v. San Jose Healthcare System, LP, the
California Supreme Court addressed a perennial problem - the definition of an "unfair"
business practice under Business and Professions Code section 17200 (section 17200).
Capito v. San Jose Healthcare System, LP (2024) 17 Cal.5th 273, 277-278
(Capito).
Section 17200 is California's analog to ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In