This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

State Bar & Bar Associations,
Alternative Dispute Resolution,
Administrative/Regulatory

Apr. 23, 2025

Navigating the complexities of SB 940: The debate over voluntary certification and its challenges

See more on Navigating the complexities of SB 940: The debate over voluntary certification and its challenges

As the State Bar struggles to implement SB 940's vague mandate for ADR certification, philosophical divisions and practice challenges raise questions about whether a workable system can be ready by the Legislature's mid-2025 deadline.

John Derrick

Alternative Resolution Centers

John Derrick is a neutral with Alternative Resolution Centers and serves on the Commercial and Consumer Rosters of the American Arbitration Association. He also serves as a panel mediator and settlement officer for several state and federal trial and appellate courts in Los Angeles and elsewhere in Southern California. Before entering full-time ADR, he practiced as an appellate specialist. The views he expresses are his own, not those of the organizations with which he works.

Navigating the complexities of SB 940: The debate over voluntary certification and its challenges

When the California Legislature enacted Senate Bill 940 last year, it delivered a "concept" of a plan for regulating the ADR industry through a system of voluntary certification. It delegated to the State Bar the task of working out the tricky details.

The process

That the statute lacks clarity is not up for debate. How to clarify and implement it is. So the State Bar has set up a 21-member working group to come up with a plan to submit to the Board of Trustees. ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up