Constitutional Law,
Business Law
Sep. 4, 2025
Business rival's disparaging texts deemed commercial speech, judge rules
Orange County Superior Court Judge Lee Gabriel denied Joshua Cua's anti-SLAPP motion in Beverage Visions, LLC v. Cua, holding that texts to BV customers--including false claims of an FBI probe and a trial loss--were commercial solicitations intended to divert business, not protected speech; the case now moves into discovery.




Orange County Superior Court Judge Lee Gabriel on Tuesday ordered a $10 million business dispute to proceed, rejecting an anti-SLAPP motion and finding that defendant Joshua Cua's disparaging texts to rival customers were not protected speech, but commercial solicitations aimed at diverting business.
The case arises from Cua's launch of competing firm Insymmetry after leaving Beverage Visions. Beverage Visions, LLC v. Cua, 30-2024-01417494-CU-CO-CJC (O.C. Super. C...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In