Data Privacy
Sep. 8, 2025
Guidance needed on legality of website tracking, judge suggests
A San Francisco judge allowed a privacy lawsuit against Future US to proceed, suggesting appellate guidance is needed on whether website tracking tools qualify as illegal surveillance under California's wiretap laws.




A putative class action that could shape the way websites acquire the personal information of visitors received a boost Friday after a San Francisco judge overruled a demurrer against the complaint but suggested the Court of Appeal needs to provide tracking technology definitions.
The action against publisher Future US -- whose collection of websites includes TechRadar and PCGamer.com -- claims it violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) when it used tracking technol...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In