This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Jan. 21, 2026

Edison criticized for cross-claims in Eaton Fire litigation cases

Edison faces pushback after filing cross-claims in Eaton Fire litigation, with plaintiffs' lawyers calling it a delay tactic while the utility says adding public agencies is standard to apportion fault.

Edison International and its Southern California subsidiary drew criticism from Eaton Fire victims' attorneys on Tuesday over a newly filed cross-complaint that seeks to shift some responsibility for losses onto public agencies, emergency responders and water providers.

Two attorneys representing individual plaintiffs in the coordinated cases called the cross-claims a familiar blame-spreading delay tactic, while Edison's outside counsel called the filing a standard step in...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up