This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Mar. 6, 2026

Attorney-client privilege dispute emerges as Musk testifies in Twitter securities trial

A federal judge grappled with attorney-client privilege issues as Elon Musk resumed testimony in a securities trial over his shifting public statements during the $44 billion Twitter acquisition dispute.

In a pretrial hearing, Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer described the securities lawsuit against Elon Musk over social media posts he made flip-flopping about his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter as one that would test the limits of attorney-client privilege.

Through nearly three days of trial, the issue had barely come up, but it came to the forefront late in the day Wednesday and into Thursday.

With Musk sitting ready to take the stand again -- after near...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up