Education Law,
Constitutional Law,
Civil Rights
Mar. 10, 2026
Federal standard, state patchwork: What the transgender athlete cases mean for Title IX compliance
The Supreme Court's pending decisions in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox will clarify the federal standard under Title IX governing transgender student participation in athletics, but because the cases arise from preliminary injunctions and states retain authority to enact their own protections, schools will likely continue navigating a patchwork of federal requirements, state laws, and compliance obligations.
Jenny Denny
Associate
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
Email: jdenny@lcwlegal.com
Jenny provides assistance to clients in matters pertaining to employment law, litigation services, private education and public education law.
The Supreme Court's pending decisions in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox are often described as the cases that will settle the national debate about transgender student participation in school athletics. That framing is catchy, but it misses the narrower question the Court is actually deciding. These cases challenge specific state statutes. The Cour...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In