This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Apr. 6, 2026

When 'mission protection' meets M&A reality

The messy unraveling of Ben & Jerry's unusual post-acquisition independence deal has corporate lawyers asking whether a structure meant to protect the ice cream maker's social mission was ever built to last.

In 2000, Ben & Jerry's thought it pulled off a rare coup by selling the company but keeping its soul.

Unilever PLC bought the ice cream company and gave it an extraordinary concession - an independent, autonomous board of directors in charge of Ben & Jerry's social mission and brand integrity.

That arrangement held for more than two decades - until it didn't.

Now, with multiple lawsuits pending by ousted directors in New York and California, c...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up