Technology
May 6, 2026
Your brain data is already being collected. The law has not caught up.
Neuroethics is rapidly emerging as a critical but underdeveloped field in law and policy, leaving the legal profession unprepared for the fast-moving rise of neural data collection, fragmented state regulation, and the coming challenges of neurotechnology across privacy, employment, IP and constitutional law.
Early in April I returned from the Asilomar Conference Grounds in Pacific Grove, California, where I served as an invited delegate to Asilomar for the Brain and Mind 2026--a convening organized by BrainMind that brought neuroscientists, ethicists, investors, clinicians and lawyers together to build governance infrastructure for neurotechnology. I participated in two working groups charged with drafting practical tools--pre-investment due diligence standards and neural data go...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In