Construction
Oct. 16, 2026
Prevailing wages, unexpected bills: Two lessons from Nabors
Mistakenly treating a project as exempt from prevailing wages can leave contractors facing increased costs. Nabors provides two takeaways on recovering those costs and the limits of retroactive statutory application.
Garret D. Murai
Partner
Nomos LLP
Email: gmurai@nomosllp.com
Garret is the editor of the California Construction Law Blog at www.calconstructionlawblog.com.
In a case that I'm frankly surprised I don't see more of, in Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. City of Long Beach, 108 Cal.App.5th 540 (2025), the Court of Appeal examined an indemnity claim by a subcontractor against a general contractor and public entity that mistakenly believed that a construction project did not require the payment of prevailing wages.
The Nabors case
Subcontractor Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. sued general ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In