This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Oct. 2, 2026

No badge above the ballot box

In two unanimous opinions, the California Supreme Court ruled that Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco unlawfully seized more than 650,000 ballots and affirmed the attorney general's constitutional authority to supervise county sheriffs, moves experts say will bolster election security and county efforts to oversee sheriffs.

The state Supreme Court last week dealt decisively with a pair of key policy challenges facing California: election integrity as the midterms approach and the power of county sheriffs in the wake of one lawman's overreach.

The justices clearly had in mind the security of the balloting as well as the highhanded behavior of some of the state's 58 elected sheriffs.

In two opinions, they metaphorically shot the sheriff and sought to make elections bulletproof.

<...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up